Hyuna
EAP2 B WW
Outline
July 25, 2007
Thesis: The Canada’s government should carefully consider what to do for old people of the future.
I. Introduce
A. History or transition about Canada’ age structure.
B. Aging society is on issue by age structure.
C. The Canada’s government should carefully consider what to do for old people of the future.
1. Canada has good medical benefit for old people.
2. Canada makes good places for old people.
3. Canada offers a regular occupation for old people.
II. Background
A. What is Canadian Age Structure?
1. CIA World Factbook (2007). Canada age structure. Indexmundi Web site.
B. What is the problem
1. Vassallo, M. (2000). Challenges of an Ageing Society Canada. Maltamigration.
C. What is the controversy about?
1. A lot of old people live in Canada.
2. Aging society influences an advantage or disadvantage
economically in Canada.
3. What will happen in Canada of the future?
III. Main Arguments
A. The Canadian government should give old people a medical benefit.
1. The government offers a little free treatment.
2. Old people have to receive a periodic medical check-up.
3. The government is received low insurance value by old people.
B. The Canadian government should make more old people’s welfare facilities for old people.
1. The government makes some rooms that old people spend a time or take a break time.
2. The government helps old people who do not move alone.
3. Old people can have the home care.
C. The Canadian government should give old people a regular occupation after they are retrained for skilled positions.
1. Young people shrink a burden for a tax.
2. Old people can help the government economically.
3. The government can shrink the pension system.
D. Many old people do not help Canada.
1. Ljunggren, D. (2007). Aging Population Poses Problem for
Canada. Reuters Canada.
IV. Conclusion
A. Three reasons.
B. Canadian government should consider old people.
C. Restatement of thesis.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기